Evaluation of aseismic integrity in the HTTR core-bottom structure V. On the static and dynamic behavior of graphitic HTTR key-keyway structures

• Published in: Nuclear engineering and design Vol. 166; no. 1; pp. 47 - 54
• Main Authors: Futakawa, Masatoshi, Takada, Shoji, Takeishi, Hiroyuki, Iyoku, Tatsuo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01-10-1996; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Energy; Energy. Thermal use of fuels; Exact sciences and technology; Fission nuclear power plants; Installations for energy generation and conversion: thermal and electrical energy; Finite element method; Earthquake resistant structure; Shear; Photoelasticity; Gas cooled reactors; Nuclear power plants; Earthquakeproof construction; High temperature; Reactor cores; Experimental study; Modeling
• ISSN: 0029-5493; 1872-759X
• DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(96)01242-3

The graphite components in high temperature gas-cooled reactors are connected to each other through a key-keyway structure that has gaps between the key and the keyway to accomodate thermal expansion. Because a dynamic load concentrates on the key-keyway structure during earthquakes, it is considered to be a crucial element for assessing the integrity of the graphite components. A combination of experiments and analyses was employed to investigate the dynamic behavior of the key-keyway structure, i.e. the equivalent stiffness associated with vibrational characteristics of the graphite components and the stress distribution under dynamic loading. The experiments were performed using a graphite scale model and a dynamic photo-elastic method. The analysis was carried out using the finite element method (FEM) code
Abaqus, taking account of the contact between the key and the keyway. The following conclusions were derived. (1) The equivalent stiffness of the key-keyway structure shows nonlinearity, owing to the contact deformation. (2) The equivalent stiffness evaluated by the FEM analysis, taking account of the non-inear contact deformation, is applicable for predicting the vibrational characteristics of ky-keyway structure. (3) The stress concentration under dynamic loading is lower than or nearly equal to that under static loading. The maximum stress concentration of the seismic load can be sufficiently evaluated under static loading conditions.