Transseptal approach versus retrograde aortic approach in mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias from anterolateral papillary muscles

• Published in: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology Vol. 35; no. 10; pp. 1913 - 1920
• Main Authors: Jiang, Chen‐Xi, Li, Shao‐Long, Li, Meng‐Meng, Tang, Ri‐Bo, Sang, Cai‐Hua, Wang, Wei, Dong, Jian‐Zeng, Long, De‐Yong, Zei, Paul C., Ma, Chang‐Sheng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-10-2024
• Subjects: Ablation; Aorta; Arrhythmia; Cardiac arrhythmia; Mapping; Muscles; papillary muscle; retrograde aortic approach; Success; transseptal approach; Ventricle; ventricular arrhythmia; ventricular arrhythmia; papillary muscle; ablation; retrograde aortic approach; transseptal approach
• ISSN: 1045-3873; 1540-8167; 1540-8167
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.16335

Introduction
The anterior and lateral position of the anterolateral papillary muscle (ALPM) has found to be reached with better catheter stability and less mechanical bumping via the transseptal (TS) compared to the retrograde aortic (RA) approach. The aim of this study is to compare the TS and RA approaches on mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from ALPMs.
Methods
Thirty‐two patients with ALPM‐VAs undergoing mapping and ablation via the TS approach were included and compared with 31 patients via the RA approach within the same period. Acute success was compared, as well as other outcomes including misinterpreted mapping results due to bumping, radiofrequency (RF) attempts, procedural time and success rate at 12‐month follow‐up.
Results
Acute success was achieved in more cases in the TS group (96.4% vs. 72.0%, p = .020). During activation mapping, bump‐provoked premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) misinterpreted as clinical PVCs were more common in the RA group (30.0% vs. 58.3%, p = .036), leading to more RF attempts (3.5 ± 2.7 vs. 7.2 ± 6.8, p = .006). Suppression of VAs were finally achieved in the unsuccessful cases by changing to the alternative approach, but the procedural time was significantly less in the TS group (90.0 ± 33.0 vs. 113.7 ± 41.1 min, p = .027) with less need to change the approach, although follow‐up success rates were similar (75.0% vs. 71.0%, p = .718).
Conclusion
A TS rather than RA approach as the initial approach appears to facilitate mapping and ablation of ALPM‐VAs, specifically by decreasing the possibility of misleading mapping results caused by bump‐provoked PVC, and increase the acute success rate thereby.
Comparation of TS and RA approach in ALPM‐VA ablation. Via the RA approach the catheter must contact the ALPM with a sharp angle, whereas the TS approach reaches it in parallel with less likelihood of causing bumping, with improved acute success and less need to cross over to a RA approach. TS=transteptal; RA=retrograde aortic; AO=aorta; ALPM=anterior lateral papillary muscle; MA=mitral annulus; LV=left ventricle.