Effectiveness and Safety of the Ozaki Procedure for Aortic Valve Disease in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 15; no. 9; p. e45269
• Main Authors: Halder, Vikram, Mishra, Amit, Ghosh, Soumitra, Singh, Harkant, Barwad, Parag, Thingnam, Shyam K, Dutta, Aduri Raja S, Harunal, Maruti
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Palo Alto Cureus Inc 14-09-2023; Cureus
• Subjects: Aortic stenosis; Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery; Cardiology; Case reports; Disease; Hemodynamics; Meta-analysis; Pediatric Surgery; Pediatrics; Physiology; Prostheses; Surgery; United Kingdom > UK; United States > US; Italy
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45269

The surgical treatment options for pediatric aortic valve disease are limited and have debatable long-term durability. In the current situation, the Ross procedure is considered in children for aortic valve disease(s). It is a complex surgical procedure with the risk of neo-aortic dilatation, converting a single valve disease into double valve disease, and associated with future re-interventions. Conversely, the Ozaki procedure has shown promising results in adults. Thus, the present study aimed to provide comparative evidence on the effectiveness and safety of the Ozaki versus Ross procedure for pediatric patients by performing a meta-analytic comparison of reporting outcomes. A total of 15 relevant articles were downloaded and among them, seven articles (one prospective study, five retrospective studies, and one case series) were used in the analysis. Primary outcomes such as physiological laminar flow pattern and hemodynamic parameters, and secondary outcomes such as hospital stays, adverse effects, mortality, and numbers of re-intervention(s) were measured in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the age of patients between children who underwent the Ozaki procedure and those who underwent the Ross procedure at the time of surgeries. The Ozaki procedure is a good solution to an aortic problem(s) similar to the Ross procedure. Unlike the Ross procedure, the Ozaki procedure has restored a physiological laminar flow pattern in the short-term follow-up without the bi-valvular disease. Mean hospital stays (p = 0.048), mean follow-up (p = 0.02), adverse effects (p = 0.02), death, and numbers of re-intervention(s) of children who underwent the Ozaki procedure were fewer than those who underwent the Ross procedure. The time required for re-intervention(s) is higher for children who underwent the Ozaki procedure than those who underwent the Ross procedure. None of the procedures, including the Ozaki procedure for aortic valve disease(s), has significant effects on hemodynamic parameters and the frequent death rate of children after surgeries. Based on our analysis, we may suggest the Ozaki procedure for aortic valve disease surgery in children.