A Comparative Analysis of the Social Impacts of a Technological Delivery System

Interview responses from tobacco growers (48 from the Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India & 35 from the Brong Ahafo & Ashanti Districts, Ghana) were compared with matched samples of nontobacco farmers (30 from each area) to assess the impact of commercial production systems on the moderni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human organization Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 193 - 197
Main Authors: SOFRANKO, ANDREW J., FLIEGEL, FREDERICK C., SHARMA, NAVIN C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The Society for Applied Anthropology 01-07-1977
Society for Applied Anthropology
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Interview responses from tobacco growers (48 from the Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, India & 35 from the Brong Ahafo & Ashanti Districts, Ghana) were compared with matched samples of nontobacco farmers (30 from each area) to assess the impact of commercial production systems on the modernization process. In addition to questions regarding individual use of technology & perception of job status, Rs were administered a twenty-four-item (Cromback alpha=.79) modernity index. Individual scores from each sample group were totalled & averaged to determine group characteristics. Findings support an anticipated correlative effect in two of the three targeted considerations of impact. Tobacco growers are more likely to adopt & use technological methods on their own nontobacco crops than are farmers with no commercial production involvement. Similarly, tobacco farmers report greater job satisfaction than found in the general farming population. In contrast, the samples showed no significant differences in value orientation, suggesting that exposure to technology has negligible influence on individual modernity. P. Hoye.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-7259
1938-3525
DOI:10.17730/humo.36.2.y6m5138m3152u053