Activity of erythromycin and clindamycin in an experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection in normal and granulocytopenic mice. A comparative in vivo and in vitro study

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 123
• Main Authors: Hoogeterp, J J, Mattie, H, van Furth, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 1993
• Subjects: Agranulocytosis - complications; Agranulocytosis - metabolism; Animals; Clindamycin - administration & dosage; Clindamycin - pharmacokinetics; Clindamycin - pharmacology; Erythromycin - administration & dosage; Erythromycin - pharmacokinetics; Erythromycin - pharmacology; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Mice; Protein Binding; Staphylococcal Infections - complications; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy; Staphylococcal Infections - metabolism; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects; Staphylococcus aureus - growth & development
• ISSN: 0036-5548
• DOI: 10.1080/00365549309169680

The activity of 2 bacteriostatic antibiotics, erythromycin and clindamycin, against Staphylococcus aureus was studied in vitro and in an experimental infection in granulocytopenic as well as normal mice. In vivo, on the basis of dosage, erythromycin was 2.20 times more potent than clindamycin in normal mice and 1.95 times more potent in irradiated granulocytopenic mice. Tissue concentrations were calculated from the plasma concentrations, taking plasma protein and tissue binding into account. On the basis of the area under the curve for the free tissue concentrations, clindamycin was 1.48 times more potent than erythromycin in normal mice and 1.64 times more potent in irradiated mice, which is somewhat less than expected from the comparison in vitro. It is concluded that the relative antistaphylococcal efficacies of erythromycin and clindamycin in vivo can be predicted from the in-vitro values if the relevant pharmacokinetics are taken into account. Irradiation decreased the efficacy of both antibiotics such that an about 8-fold increase in dose led to an antibacterial effect similar to that in non-irradiated animals. This could imply that these drugs will not be sufficiently effective against staphylococcal infections in granulocytopenic patients.