Knowledge Maps and Emerging Trends in Cell-Cultured Meat since the 21st Century Research: Based on Different National Perspectives of Spatial-Temporal Analysis

• Published in: Foods Vol. 13; no. 13; p. 2070
• Main Authors: Song, Huiqi, Chen, Pengwei, Sun, Yiwen, Sheng, Jiping, Zhou, Lin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 29-06-2024
• Subjects: 21st century; alternative protein; Animal welfare; Bibliometrics; Biomaterials; Biomedical materials; cell-cultured meat; Citespace; Cooperation; Cultured meat; Food safety; Food security; Institutions; Keywords; Knowledge; Land use; Meat; Nomenclatures; Plant-based foods; Product development; Public opinion; R&D; Regions; Research & development; Software; Spatial analysis; Spatial variations; Sustainable development; Trends; visual analysis; Vosviewer; nomenclature; Vosviewer; visual analysis; Citespace; bibliometrics; alternative protein; cell-cultured meat
• ISSN: 2304-8158; 2304-8158
• DOI: 10.3390/foods13132070

Cell-cultured meat holds significant environmental value as an alternative protein source. Throughout the 21st century, cell-cultured meat has progressively penetrated commercial markets. However, a systematic review encompassing the entire field needs improvement. Employing Citespace, Vosviewer, and R-Bibliometrix software, a bibliometric analysis was used to present the research progress and general development trends of 484 articles on cell-cultured meat from 2000 to 2022 based on countries, authors, institutions, and keywords. This analysis provides ideas for the future development of cell-cultured meat in different countries or regions worldwide. Research on cell-cultured meat from 2000 to 2022 has undergone two phases: fluctuating growth (2000-2013) and rapid growth (2013-2022). Noteworthy contributions to cell-cultured meat studies emerge from author groups in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and China, with influential institutions like the University of Bath significantly impacting pertinent research. Furthermore, over the past two decades, research has leaned towards exploring topics such as "biomaterials", "cultured", "land use", "public opinion", "animal welfare", and "food safety". Furthermore, this study reveals differences in nomenclature between regions and institutions. "Cultured meat" is more popular in some countries than in other forms. Institutions in Asia use "cultured meat" more frequently; however, institutions in the Americas adopt "cultivated meat" and rarely adopt "in vitro meat", and institutions in the European region have no particularly prominent tendency towards a specific nomenclature. Future research should emphasize aligning the labeling of cell-cultured meat with effective management strategies and referencing regulatory policies across various countries. For the first time, we use three different bibliometric methods to analyze temporal and spatial variation in research on cellular meat. The results of this study have a multiplier effect. We provide a theoretical basis and a practical reference for the identification of alternatives in the dual context of "food crisis and food security" and "climate crisis". At the same time, we also provide a reference for the sustainable development of the food system.