Effect of altitude on male parental expenditure in Mountain Bluebirds (Sialia currucoides): are higher-altitude males more attentive fathers?

• Published in: Journal of ornithology Vol. 148; no. 1; pp. 9 - 16
• Main Authors: Johnson, L. Scott, Brubaker, Jessica L., Ostlind, Emilene, Balenger, Susan L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V 01-01-2007
• Subjects: Altitude; Animal behavior; Breeding sites; Climate effects; Climate prediction; Energy; Females; Hatching; Males; Offspring; Parental behavior; Prey; Sialia currucoides; Sialia sialis
• ISSN: 2193-7192; 2193-7206
• DOI: 10.1007/s10336-006-0092-2

Male investment of time and energy in caring for offspring varies substantially both between and within bird species. Explaining this variation is of long-standing interest to ornithologists. One factor that may affect male care is breeding site altitude, through its effects on climate. The harsher, less predictable abiotic conditions at higher altitudes are hypothesized to favour increased male investment of time and energy in offspring care. We tested this hypothesis by comparing male parental behaviour in Mountain Bluebirds (Sialia currucoides) nesting at 1500 and 2500 m a.s.l. in the Bighorn Mountains of Wyoming, USA. We compared rates of prey delivery to nestlings at these two altitudes at two times: 1–2 days after hatching, when females spend much of their time brooding young, and 12–13 days later, when brooding has ended and nestling energy demands are peaking. High-altitude males fed nestlings 18 and 28% more often than low-altitude males early and later in the nestling stage, respectively, but only the difference in late-stage feeding rates were significant. Like males, females at the high site also fed nestlings significantly more often than females at the low site later in the nestling stage (45% difference in feeding rates). Consequently, the proportion of all feeding trips made by males at the high site (40%) did not differ significantly from that at the low site (44%). Parents at the high altitude may feed nestlings more often to compensate for their greater thermoregulatory costs. Parents may also be attempting to assist nestlings in storing fat and/or attaining a large size and effective homeothermy as quickly as possible to enhance nestling ability to survive bouts of severe weather which are common at high altitudes.