The elastase inhibitory capacity and the alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor and bronchial inhibitor content of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from healthy subjects
Pulmonary emphysema is currently thought to be due to an elastase-antielastase imbalance with resultant destruction of alveolar structures. The present study was aimed at testing whether alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha 1 PI) is the major component of the antielastase screen of the lower respirat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological chemistry Hoppe-Seyler Vol. 368; no. 8; p. 981 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Germany
01-08-1987
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Pulmonary emphysema is currently thought to be due to an elastase-antielastase imbalance with resultant destruction of alveolar structures. The present study was aimed at testing whether alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha 1 PI) is the major component of the antielastase screen of the lower respiratory tract of healthy subjects. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed in 8 nonsmokers (27.8 +/- 3.8 years) and 9 smokers (25 +/- 0.96 years). The lavage fluids were tested for leukocyte and pancreatic elastase inhibitory capacity (LEIC and PEIC) and immunoreactive alpha 1 PI and bronchial inhibitor (brI) content. The mean +/- s.e.m. levels of LEIC, PEIC, alpha 1 PI and brI were 0.16 +/- 0.039, 0.042 +/- 0.006, 0.09 +/- 0.007 and 0.013 +/- 0.002 mol/mol albumin, respectively. Thus, on the average, the molar concentration of brI was about 14% that of alpha 1 PI. The difference between LEIC and alpha 1 PI did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.0503). The PEIC was however significantly lower than the alpha 1 PI levels (P less than 0.05), indicating that the lavage fluids contained both active and inactive alpha 1 PI. Nonsmokers and smokers did not differ in their LEIC, PEIC, alpha 1 PI and brI levels. When the data were examined on an individual basis, the subjects could be divided into 2 groups: group I (n = 9; 3 nonsmokers, 6 smokers) whose LEIC/alpha 1 PI molar ratios were higher than unity and group II (n = 8; 5 nonsmokers, 3 smokers) whose LEIC/alpha 1 PI molar ratios were equal or lower than unity. Group I subjects had significantly higher LEIC values (0.26 +/- 0.05 mol elastase inhibited/mol albumin) than group II individuals (0.055 +/- 0.006; P less than 0.001) but the two groups had similar levels of immunoreactive alpha 1 PI (0.09 and 0.08 mol alpha 1 PI/mol albumin for group I and II, respectively), functionally active alpha 1 PI (percentage of active alpha 1 PI: 53% and 37% for group I and II, respectively) and immunoreactive brI (0.016 and 0.010 mol brI/mol albumin for group I and II, respectively). These results suggested that the lavage fluids from group I contained significant amounts of undefined leukocyte elastase inhibitor(s). Gel filtration of a lavage fluid from group I showed that the undefined elastase inhibitor(s) co-eluted with brI. Most of the lavage fluids were still able to inhibit leukocyte elastase following removal of alpha 1 PI by perchloric acid precipitation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0177-3593 |
DOI: | 10.1515/bchm3.1987.368.2.981 |