Influence of buffer quality on pH measurement uncertainty: prediction and experimental evaluation

Dependence of the uncertainty of a pH measurement result on the quality of buffers (i.e. the uncertainty of their certified pH values) at different levels of instrumental uncertainty (pH-meter, etc.) was simulated using the Monte Carlo method and regression analysis. The contribution of the instrume...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accreditation and quality assurance Vol. 7; no. 10; pp. 412 - 416
Main Authors: Ekeltchik, Irina, Kardash-Strochkova, Elena, Dreazen, Orna, Kuselman, I.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V 01-10-2002
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dependence of the uncertainty of a pH measurement result on the quality of buffers (i.e. the uncertainty of their certified pH values) at different levels of instrumental uncertainty (pH-meter, etc.) was simulated using the Monte Carlo method and regression analysis. The contribution of the instrumental standard uncertainty (in the studied range from 0.1 to 1 mV) to the uncertainty of the pH measurement result is negligible, if the standard uncertainties of the pH buffers exceed 0.04 pH (e. g. for in-house buffers). It is shown how the choice of pH-meter and buffers should be correlated in order to meet the required uncertainty of a pH measurement result in a sample under analysis. The results of the simulation were compared with experimental data obtained from calibrations of a pH/ion-meter with a hydrogen working electrode (Radiometer PHM-240) and with a glass electrode (Metrohm 744). Buffers of different quality (National Institute for Standards and Technology standard reference materials, certified Radiometer buffers and Merck CertiPUR buffers) were used for the calibrations. The uncertainties of the experimental results are close to the predicted ones obtained by the simulation.
ISSN:0949-1775
1432-0517
DOI:10.1007/s00769-002-0521-8