Feasibility study and performance evaluation of low capacity water–LiBr absorption cooling systems functioning in different Algerian climate zones

•Water–LiBr absorption chillers were analysed in the five climate zones in Algeria.•In zones E1 and E2, the chillers produced chilled water at 7 °C and partial charge.•In the hot zones E3, E4 and E5, it was not feasible to produce chilled water at 7 °C.•The chillers were able to produce chilled wate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of refrigeration Vol. 82; pp. 36 - 50
Main Authors: Ketfi, Omar, Merzouk, Mustapha, Merzouk, Nachida Kasbadji, Bourouis, Mahmoud
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Paris Elsevier Ltd 01-10-2017
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Water–LiBr absorption chillers were analysed in the five climate zones in Algeria.•In zones E1 and E2, the chillers produced chilled water at 7 °C and partial charge.•In the hot zones E3, E4 and E5, it was not feasible to produce chilled water at 7 °C.•The chillers were able to produce chilled water at 12 °C in zones E3 and E4.•The chillers were not able to operate under the thermal conditions of zone E5. A performance analysis was carried out on water–LiBr absorption chillers performing in the five different climate zones in Algeria. A 17.6 kW single-effect and a 16 kW double-effect commercial absorption chillers were simulated. In climate zones E1 and E2, the single-effect and double-effect chillers supplied 37% and 91%, respectively, of their nominal capacity to produce chilled water at 7 °C. In the hot climate zones E3, E4 and E5, it was not feasible for either of the chillers to produce chilled water at 7 °C. By increasing the chilled water temperature to 12 °C both absorption chillers were able to operate in climate zones E3 and E4. The single-effect chiller reached 45% of its nominal capacity in zone E3 and 33% in zone E4. The double-effect chiller delivered 80% of its nominal capacity in both climate zones. Neither of the chillers was able to operate under the thermal conditions of climate zone E5.
ISSN:0140-7007
1879-2081
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.07.002