Genetic Divergence and Diversity Reflect a Predominant Freshwater Resident Life History in Rainbow Trout from Southwestern Alaska

Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in southwestern Alaska occupy coastal watersheds near the northern boundary of the species’ native range and support a world‐class wild trout sport fishery. Although low freshwater temperatures and a short growing season in this region may favor anadromy, these popu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (1900) Vol. 151; no. 2; pp. 202 - 214
Main Authors: Olsen, Jeffrey B., Walsh, Patrick, Benson, Anna‐Marie, Schwanke, Craig J., Wenburg, John K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-03-2022
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in southwestern Alaska occupy coastal watersheds near the northern boundary of the species’ native range and support a world‐class wild trout sport fishery. Although low freshwater temperatures and a short growing season in this region may favor anadromy, these populations appear to exhibit a freshwater resident life history strategy. We used genetic data to evaluate two hypotheses regarding the influence of the presumed migratory behavior of these Rainbow Trout on reproductive isolation among and within watersheds. The results were largely consistent with the predictions, but there were exceptions. The data supported the hypothesis that the freshwater resident behavior precludes marine‐mediated gene flow, resulting in large genetic divergence and low admixture among watersheds. The estimate of among‐watershed differentiation (FCT = 0.350) was large and reflected over 96% of the variation among all sampled aggregations (FST = 0.363). However, evidence of admixed individuals in two adjacent watersheds and five first‐generation migrants among five watersheds suggests that the potential for coastal migration with gene flow exists in these populations. The data also supported the hypothesis that aggregations formed within watersheds during the spawning period (May–June) represent reproductively isolated populations. Pairwise estimates of FST and the G‐test results revealed population structure in four of the six watersheds tested. However, not all aggregation pairs were found to be genetically distinct and there was notable variation in the pairwise FST estimates (0.000–0.067). In summary, the data reflected the predicted results for each hypothesis but also revealed exceptions that, consistent with tagging studies, demonstrate the complexity of migratory behavior in southwestern Alaska Rainbow Trout. We discuss the implications of these results for fishery management and conservation.
ISSN:0002-8487
1548-8659
DOI:10.1002/tafs.10339