Winstedt, colonialism and the Malaysian history wars

• Published in: Indonesia and the Malay world Vol. 52; no. 153; pp. 179 - 198
• Main Authors: Milner, Anthony, Wong, Wilbert W. W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Routledge 03-05-2024; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: 20th century; colonial discourse; Colonialism; Historians; historiography; history of ideas; Malay history; Malaya/Malaysia; Narratives; Nation building; National independence; pembentukan negara; pensejarahan; Postcolonialism; Regions; sejarah idea; sejarah Melayu; wacana kolonial; Malaysia
• ISSN: 1363-9811; 1469-8382
• DOI: 10.1080/13639811.2024.2351280

European colonialist thinking continues to influence history writing after national independence - even in the construction of national narratives. In the case of Malaysia, the work of the scholar-official, Richard Winstedt, has had a far-reaching impact - and one that is seldom recognised. The 20th century was a crucial period in the political and historical construction of 'Malay(si)a' - a time when a colonial state was imagined, and then positioned as a foundation for post-colonial nation-building. Malay(si)a did not exist as a political entity before this time - it had to be carved out of the Indian (or 'Malay') Archipelago, an enormous region largely under Dutch authority. The historical construction of Malay(si)a was never a homogenous process, even in colonial narratives. This article examines the strategy Winstedt undertook to develop a state narrative - suggesting how his work moved beyond that of earlier British historians. Although Winstedt's project was explicitly 'modern' in its purpose and style, we also note ways in which he was influenced by pre-modern Malay writers. The final section examines Winstedt's impact on local Malay(si)an writing, including Malaysia's standard national narrative. Some local historians, however, resisted Winstedt - and sought to write the Malaysian nation from alternative perspectives. Nation-making in this and other regions of Southeast Asia is all the more interesting because it has been a dialogic rather than merely integrative project.