Prioritization for liver transplantation using the MELD score in Chile: Inequities generated by MELD exceptions

• Published in: Annals of hepatology Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 325 - 330
• Main Authors: Díaz, Luis A, Norero, Blanca, Lara, Bárbara, Robles, Camila, Elgueta, Susana, Humeres, Roberto, Poniachik, Jaime, Silva, Guillermo, Wolff, Rodrigo, Innocenti, Franco, Rojas, José L, Zapata, Rodrigo, Hunter, Bessie, Álvarez, Sergio, Cancino, Alejandra, Ibarra, José, Rius, Montserrat, González, Sandra, Calabrán, Lorena, Pérez, Rosa M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 01-03-2019
• Subjects: Cadaveric liver transplantation; Chronic liver disease; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Liver transplantation; Waitlist mortality; Chronic liver disease; Cadaveric liver transplantation; Waitlist mortality; Liver transplantation
• ISSN: 1665-2681
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2018.11.001

AbstractIntroduction and aimThe MELD score has been established as an efficient and rigorous prioritization system for liver transplant (LT). Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the MELD score as a system for prioritization for LT, in terms of decreasing the dropout rate in the waiting list and maintaining an adequate survival post-LT in Chile. Materials and methodsWe analyzed the Chilean Public Health Institute liver transplant registry of candidates listed from October 15th 2011 to December 31st 2014. We included adult candidates (>15 years old) listed for elective cadaveric LT with a MELD score of 15 or higher. Statistical analysis included survival curves (Kaplan–Meier), log-rank statistics and multivariate logistic regression. Results420 candidates were analyzed. Mean age was 53.6 ± 11.8 years, and 244 were men (58%). Causes of LT included: Liver cirrhosis without exceptions (HC) 177 (66.4%); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 111 (26.4%); cirrhosis with non-HCC exceptions 102 (24.3%) and non-cirrhotic candidates 30 (7.2%). LT rate was 43.2%. The dropout rate was 37.6% at 1-year. Even though the LT rate was higher, the annual dropout rate was significantly higher in cirrhotic candidates (without exceptions) compared with cirrhotics with HCC, and non-HCC exceptions plus non-cirrhotic candidates (47.9%; 37.2% and 24.2%, respectively, with p= 0.004). Post-LT survival was 84% per year, with no significant differences between the three groups ( p= 0.95). ConclusionPrioritization for LT using the MELD score system has not decreased the dropout rate in Chile (persistent low donor's rate). Exceptions generate inequities in dropout rate, disadvantaging patients without exceptions.