A multicriteria vulnerability index for equitable resource allocation in public health funding

• Published in: Canadian journal of public health Vol. 115; no. 5; pp. 825 - 833
• Main Authors: Abi-Zeid, Irène, Bouchard, Nicole, Bousquet, Morgane, Cerutti, Jérôme, Dupéré, Sophie, Fortier, Julie, Lavoie, Roxane, Mauger, Isabelle, Raymond, Catherine, Richard, Estelle, Savard, Lynda
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-10-2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Collaboration; Cooperation; Funding; Geographic information systems; Health care expenditures; Innovations in Policy and Practice; Intervention; Knowledge management; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Multidisciplinary research; Multiple criterion; Public Health; Qualitative analysis; Remote sensing; Research projects; Resource allocation; évaluation de la vulnérabilité; Deprivation; Multicriteria evaluation; recherche mixte; Mixed research; financement de la santé publique; Public health funding; défavorisation; Budget allocation; Modèle multicritère; allocation budgétaire; Vulnerability assessment
• ISSN: 0008-4263; 1920-7476; 1920-7476
• DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00903-8

Setting
This paper describes an action research project with the
Centre universitaire intégré de santé et de services sociaux - Capitale Nationale
(CIUSSS-CN) who identified a need to assess vulnerability in their territories in order to ensure equitable distribution of the Integrated Perinatal and Early Childhood Services (SIPPE) program funds. The objective was to design and validate a multicriteria model to provide a more accurate portrait of vulnerability based on recent social realities.
Intervention
Our multidisciplinary research team of 7 members included experts in analytics, decision aiding, and community and public health. In collaboration with 6 CIUSSS-CN professionals, we co-constructed, during 9 workshops, a multicriteria model to aggregate the multiple dimensions of vulnerability. We used a value-focused thinking approach and applied the method MACBETH assisted by a geographic information system.
Outcomes
Criteria, scales, and weights were validated and led to a vulnerability score for each CIUSSS-CN territory. This score provides a more accurate portrait of territorial disparities based on data and the participants’ experience. The model was implemented in a dynamic user-friendly tool and serves to support decision-makers in the resource allocation process. Knowledge transfer was conducted during and after the process.
Implications
This multidisciplinary research has served to anchor public health funding in local realities, with an emphasis on equity and stakeholder engagement. Our mixed-method approach integrating qualitative and quantitative data is adaptable to other contexts. Our results can enhance intervention effectiveness and allow for a better response to the needs of the population targeted by the SIPPE program.