Could art cycles have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve? A retrospective case control study

Even if it is supposed damage of repeated ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles on oocyte pool, there is still no evidence in literature. Aim of the study is to investigate whether infertile women who undergo to several ART cycles can show a lower ovarian reserve measured by AMH (Anti-Muller...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Minerva ginecologica Vol. 72; no. 2; p. 75
Main Authors: Riganelli, Lucia, Merlino, Lucia, Aragona, Cesare, Capri, Oriana, Franceschetti, Silvia, Linari, Antonella, Mariani, Marianna, Micara, Giulietta, Pietrangeli, Daniela, Porpora, Maria G, Piccioni, Maria G
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Italy 01-04-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Even if it is supposed damage of repeated ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles on oocyte pool, there is still no evidence in literature. Aim of the study is to investigate whether infertile women who undergo to several ART cycles can show a lower ovarian reserve measured by AMH (Anti-Mullerian hormone) levels. The study includes 282 infertile women, between 18 and 42 years, and allocated into two groups: 159 women previously submitted to two or more ART cycles (group A) and 123 women never submitted naïve to-ART cycles (group B). We tested whether AMH, FSH, LH and E2 levels were significantly different between the two groups, stratifying according to age. Regardless to the age ranges bands, the AMH in group A was statistically significant lower than in group B with a statistical significance (P=0.047). In particular women aged over 35 previously submitted to one or more ART cycles showed lower AMH levels, than those paired with age, which had never been treated with ART. Despite the limitations of the study, our data demonstrate a reduced AMH levels in women aged over 35 previously submitted to two or more repeated ART-cycles compared to patients never treated before. The strength of this study is the actuality of the topic that has not been discussed before in detail.
ISSN:1827-1650
DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04542-6