The challenge of pelvic discontinuity: cup-cage reconstruction does better than conventional cages in mid-term

• Published in: The bone & joint journal Vol. 96-B; no. 2; p. 195
• Main Authors: Abolghasemian, M, Tangsaraporn, S, Drexler, M, Barbuto, R, Backstein, D, Safir, O, Kuzyk, P, Gross, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-02-2014
• Subjects: Acetabulum - surgery; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods; Bone Transplantation - methods; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pelvic Bones - surgery; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Acetabular bone loss; Cage; Cup-cage; Acetabular reconstruction; Pelvic discontinuity; Acetabular revision arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2049-4408
• DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.31907

The use of ilioischial cage reconstruction for pelvic discontinuity has been replaced by the Trabecular Metal (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) cup-cage technique in our institution, due to the unsatisfactory outcome of using a cage alone in this situation. We report the outcome of 26 pelvic discontinuities in 24 patients (20 women and four men, mean age 65 years (44 to 84)) treated by the cup-cage technique at a mean follow-up of 82 months (12 to 113) and compared them with a series of 19 pelvic discontinuities in 19 patients (18 women and one man, mean age 70 years (42 to 86)) treated with a cage at a mean follow-up of 69 months (1 to 170). The clinical and radiological outcomes as well as the survivorship of the groups were compared. In all, four of the cup-cage group (15%) and 13 (68%) of the cage group failed due to septic or aseptic loosening. The seven-year survivorship was 87.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 71 to 103) for the cup-cage group and 49.9% (95% CI 15 to 84) for the cage-alone group (p = 0.009). There were four major complications in the cup-cage group and nine in the cage group. Radiological union of the discontinuity was found in all successful cases in the cup-cage group and three of the successful cage cases. Three hips in the cup-cage group developed early radiological migration of the components, which stabilised with a successful outcome. Cup-cage reconstruction is a reliable technique for treating pelvic discontinuity in mid-term follow-up and is preferred to ilioischial cage reconstruction. If the continuity of the bone graft at the discontinuity site is not disrupted, early migration of the components does not necessarily result in failure.