Improving lightning protection with corona minimising air terminals

A comprehensive approach to lightning protection is comprised of four key steps, namely protection against direct lightning strikes, dealing with surges and transients, dissipation of lightning currents via earthing and bonding, and protecting people. This paper deals with new research findings asso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of electrostatics Vol. 129; p. 103926
Main Author: D'Alessandro, F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01-06-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A comprehensive approach to lightning protection is comprised of four key steps, namely protection against direct lightning strikes, dealing with surges and transients, dissipation of lightning currents via earthing and bonding, and protecting people. This paper deals with new research findings associated with direct-strike protection with lightning rods or “air terminals”, namely the effect of accumulated corona space charge around the tips of these components. There is now a great deal of consensus amongst lightning researchers and practitioners that space charge accumulation reduces the efficiency of an air terminal by inhibiting the initiation and development of an upward leader, a critical stage in the lightning attachment process. The paper describes measurements carried out in a high-voltage laboratory to quantify the amount of corona discharge that would be emitted under thunderstorm conditions from a variety of air terminals of different geometries. A unique, previously unreported aspect of these experiments was the corona testing of air terminals under dry and wet conditions. The results of these experiments showed that corona discharge (and hence space charge accumulation) from a standard Franklin rod is substantially higher than from the range of significantly blunter “corona minimising” air terminals that were tested. The previously reported polarity difference in corona characteristics was also observed, i.e., the magnitude of negative corona was larger than positive corona for the same ambient electric field. Differences in corona discharge were also observed under wet and dry conditions, where wet air terminals were found to produce modestly more corona. The paper then addresses the optimisation of air terminals, i.e., minimising corona discharge, for practical lightning protection applications, where the air terminal radius of curvature is tailored to its height and position of installation. Various researchers have made these calculations, the outcomes of which are summarised in this paper. In general, radii of curvature in the range 1–100 mm are required, depending on the installation height and location of the air terminal. •Space charge effects around the tips of air terminals reduce the efficiency of lightning capture by inhibiting upward leader development.•Corona characteristics of air terminals have been quantified by simulating the electric field of a thundercloud in a HV laboratory.•Air terminals can be optimised for corona performance via their geometry or radius of curvature.•Typical optimum radii of curvature are in the range 1–100 mm, depending on installation height and location.
ISSN:0304-3886
1873-5738
DOI:10.1016/j.elstat.2024.103926