Daily responses of the planktonic food web to environmental dynamics in the vegetated littoral zone of a large shallow lake

• Published in: Limnologica Vol. 102; p. 126096
• Main Authors: Rosa, Luana Morais da, Cardoso, Luciana de Souza, Silveira, Mônica Hessel, Crossetti, Luciane Oliveira, Canterle, Eliete Regina Bertazzo, Cavalcanti, José Rafael, Motta-Marques, David da, Rodrigues, Lúcia Ribeiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier GmbH 01-09-2023
• Subjects: Biomass ratio; Emergent macrophytes; Humic substances; Microbial food web; Predation; Emergent macrophytes; Biomass ratio; Predation; Humic substances; Microbial food web
• ISSN: 0075-9511; 1873-5851
• DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2023.126096

Littoral zones are the most productive areas of shallow lakes and make important contributions to energy transfer to higher trophic levels in aquatic ecosystems. Great habitat heterogeneity characterizes the littoral ecosystems, often encompassing macrophyte covered areas that provide microhabitats with diverse structural complexity, and several effects over the structure and function of biological communities. The effects of macrophytes on trophic interactions are more complex in subtropical lakes than in temperate lakes. The relationships between planktonic food web components and the effects of a highly dynamic environment in structuring plankton communities were studied in a large subtropical shallow lake. The study was conducted for twenty-five consecutive days in the summer of 2016 at two sites (Station 1 and Station 2) in the well-developed littoral zone of Lake Mangueira hosting different plant life forms. Strong spatial variation between sampling stations was evidenced in the density of most of the communities, with the highest means of bacterioplankton, phytoplankton, and ciliates density being recorded at the station surrounded mainly by submerged macrophytes (Station 1). These plants particularly modify microhabitat complexity by increasing the availability and functional diversity of niches. Furthermore, submerged macrophytes tend to accumulate more periphyton biomass, a quality food resource for many consumers. Important grazing relationships, nutrient demands, and trophic structure were assessed through carbon biomass of the communities. Phytoplankton accounted for a greater proportion of the entire plankton community than bacteria, while zooplankton had low carbon biomass of crustaceans and a high dominance of ciliates and rotifers, with a greater grazing impact on bacterioplankton than on phytoplankton. According to RDA and multiple-regression analysis, nutrients and humic substances were the main predictors of variability in the littoral food web components over a short-sampling interval. The carbon biomass of bacteria and metazooplankton were both positively related to humic substances and nutrients at Station 1, as well as the biomass ratio of metazooplankton to phytoplankton and metazooplankton to ciliates. This suggests that humic substances have been metabolized by bacteria and transferred to higher trophic levels through predation. On the other hand, humic substances negatively affected the carbon biomass of bacteria and cyanobacteria at Station 2, suggesting a mostly refractory DOC around the emergent plants. Results indicate that despite the greater importance of bacterial biomass in the energy transfer through zooplankton predation, the efficiency of carbon transfer in algal and bacteria-based food webs was both very low. The effects of macrophytes on the quantity and/or quality of nutrients and substrates for bacteria uptake and phytoplankton requirements, explained the spatial variability of plankton food web components, even over the short distance between stations, as well as the inefficient microbial loop found in the littoral zone inhabited by macrophytes.
•High variability of the planktonic food web components occurred in a short distance.•The plankton communities quickly responded to fast changing in nutrients.•The carbon biomass ratios between metazooplankton and phytoplankton were very low.•Lower bacterial biomass indicated the low efficiency of the microbial patches.