The Neglected Virtue

• Published in: New Blackfriars Vol. 77; no. 906; pp. 348 - 357
• Main Authors: Finn, Richard, McGonigal, James
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-07-1996; English Dominicans; Blackfriar Press, etc
• Subjects: Bishops; Christian ethics; Churches; Exile; Insults; Justice; Penance; Temperance; Theology; Virtue
• ISSN: 0028-4289; 1741-2005
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2005.1996.tb01567.x

In the contemporary recovery of virtue ethics some virtues have fared better than others.
The Oxford Companion to Philosophy
has entries for
justice, wisdom, courage, self-control
and the good of
friendship
integral to the life of virtue as understood by Aristotle and Aquinas. Yet between
Hume’s fork
and
Humour
there is no mention of humility. Why so? Aquinas wrote that “after the theological virtues, after the intellectual virtues which regard the reason itself, and after justice, especially legal justice, humility stands before all others.”
The reasons for this eclipse of humility are several. One is the absence of humility from the Classical Greek and Roman account of virtue or excellence. Not only is it missing from that account, but for many in the Ancient world to be humble or lowly was to suffer evil.
Humilitas
meant first a lowly and despicable origin. It was to be born a nobody. In the
Tusculan Disputations
Cicero’s privileged interlocutor M, discussing that chestnut of ancient philosophy, whether happiness is a matter of virtue alone, or virtue in conjunction with good fortune, lists those evils, or apparent evils, which can afflict us and lie largely beyond our control, beyond the self-definition of character: “poverty, obscurity, insignificance, loneliness, loss of property, severe physical pain, ruined health, infirmity, blindness, fall of one’s country, exile and, to crown all, slavery.” The word ‘insignificance’ here translates the Latin
humilitas
.’ To some this humility was incompatible with virtue. If excellence is a matter of character, of
who
one is and not merely
what
one does, and if who one is in a patriarchal world is to be the son of this father, to claim these ancestors, to be a nobody is already to fail in excellence, to be base.