Piano‐stool dinuclear ruthenium (II) complexes of pyrazine‐carboxylate/carboxamide ligands: Structural studies and catalytic transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Reactions of ligand pyrazine‐2‐carboxylic acid ( HL1 ) with [Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl 2 ] 2 precursor gave the dinuclear piano‐stool ruthenium (II) complex [{Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl 2 }‐μ‐( L1 )‐{Ru( p ‐cymene)Cl}] ( Ru1 ). Separately, reactions of N‐ (quinolin‐8‐yl) pyrazine‐2‐carboxamide ( HL2 ), 5‐met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied organometallic chemistry Vol. 37; no. 11
Main Authors: Kumah, Robert T., Ojwach, Stephen O.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-11-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reactions of ligand pyrazine‐2‐carboxylic acid ( HL1 ) with [Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl 2 ] 2 precursor gave the dinuclear piano‐stool ruthenium (II) complex [{Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl 2 }‐μ‐( L1 )‐{Ru( p ‐cymene)Cl}] ( Ru1 ). Separately, reactions of N‐ (quinolin‐8‐yl) pyrazine‐2‐carboxamide ( HL2 ), 5‐methyl‐ N ‐(−(quinolin‐8‐yl) pyridine‐2‐carboxamide ( HL3 ) and 5‐chloro‐ N ‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) pyridine‐2‐carboxamide ( HL4 ) with [Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl 2 ] 2 dimer in the presence of KPF 6 afforded the cationic dinuclear complexes [{Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl} 2 ‐μ‐( L2 )][PF 6 ] ( Ru2 ), [{Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl} 2 ‐μ‐( L3 )][Ru( L3 )Cl 3 ] ( Ru3 ) and [{Ru(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)Cl} 2 ‐μ‐( L4 )][PF 6 ] ( Ru4 ). The Ru (II) complexes were analysed using FT‐IR, 1 H, 13 C{ 1 H}, 31 P{ 1 H} ( Ru2 and Ru4 ) and 19 F ( Ru2 and Ru4 ) NMR spectroscopic techniques, micro‐analyses and mass spectrometry. Molecular structures of complexes Ru1 and Ru3 were confirmed to display piano‐stool coordination nature using single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography analyses. All the complexes ( Ru1–Ru4 ) mediated the transfer hydrogenation (TH) of a broad spectrum of ketones in isopropanol in the presence of a base and demonstrated high catalytic activities (TON of 24,000) at catalyst concentrations of 0.002 mol%. In general, the catalytic performance of these Ru (II) complexes depended on the identity of the ligands, coordination chemistry and ketone substrates.
ISSN:0268-2605
1099-0739
DOI:10.1002/aoc.7269