What Do Prosecutors Maximize? An Analysis of the Federalization of Drug Crimes

What Do Prosecutors Maximize? An Analysis of the Federalization of Drug Crimes

Recent legislation has expanded the jurisdiction of the federal government over crimes that were traditionally prohibited only by state law. We model the decisionmaking process of state and federal prosecutors, and the determinants of prosecutors' decisions to allocate drug cases to the state v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American law and economics review Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 259 - 290
Main Authors: Glaeser, Edward L., Kessler, Daniel P., Piehl, Anne Morrison
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cary Oxford University Press 01-10-2000
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects:
Attorneys
Criminal justice
Criminal offenses
Criminal prosecution
Criminals
Drug crimes
Drug related crimes
Federal criminal offenses
Prisoners
Prosecuting attorneys
Public prosecutors
States attorney
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent legislation has expanded the jurisdiction of the federal government over crimes that were traditionally prohibited only by state law. We model the decisionmaking process of state and federal prosecutors, and the determinants of prosecutors' decisions to allocate drug cases to the state versus the federal systems. Using 1991 surveys of state and federal inmates incarcerated for drug crimes, we find that individuals who hire private attorneys and who are high-human-capital and successful in the legitimate sector are more likely to end up in the federal system. This is consistent with the model in which prosecutors maximize both the payoffs from eliminating crime and their private human capital.
ISSN:1465-7252
1465-7260
DOI:10.1093/aler/2.2.259