Ethics of Conflict, Violence and Peace – Just War and a Feminist Ethic of Care

• Published in: Conatus - journal of philosophy Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 147 - 173
• Main Author: Ellner, Andrea
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory 31-12-2023
• Subjects: ethic of care; feminism; just war; non-violence; pacifism; positive peace
• ISSN: 2653-9373; 2459-3842
• DOI: 10.12681/cjp.35282

This paper critically examines Just War Theory and its philosophical foundations, which are conventionally positioned in opposition to pacifism and nonviolent conflict. This paper, however, takes the view that both, Just War Theory as well as pacifism and nonviolent conflict, are equally necessary and complementary approaches to living with the possibilities and tragedies of the human condition. Its approach is grounded in feminist theory and methodology and their connections with Galtung’s models of violence and peace. The paper argues that the weaknesses of Just War Theory are intrinsic to the concept and its intent. The inherent contradiction of Just War Theory being that it intended to translate universal moral principles into reality, which makes them context dependent. Fundamentally, Just War Theory is derived from an ethic of justice ultimately centred on the right to use violence and kill. The right is conditional but means that a path to peace inevitably starts from death. An ethic of care is a philosophy where feminist thought meets pacifism and nonviolent conflict. It starts from the creation of life and charts paths to positive peace through the nurture of the conditions for lives in dignity. If we seek to contain the destructive and give space to the creative aspects of the human condition and understand its two extremes, life and death, in their relation to human agency, better we need to complement the traditional ethic of justice (of war and violence) with an ethic of care.