Coupling kinetic modeling with artificial neural networks to predict the kinetic parameters of pine needle pyrolysis

The pyrolysis behavior of biomass is critical for industrial process design, yet the complexity of pyrolysis models makes this task challenging. This paper introduces an innovative hybrid model to quantify the pyrolysis potential of pine needles, predicting the entire process of their pyrolysis beha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresources Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 7513 - 7529
Main Authors: Xu, Langui, Zhang, Lin, He, Xiangjun, He, Wenbin, Wang, Ziyong, Niu, Weihua, Wei, Dong, Ran, Yi, Wu, Wendan, Cheng, Mingjun, Liu, Jundou, Huang, Ruyi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 01-11-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The pyrolysis behavior of biomass is critical for industrial process design, yet the complexity of pyrolysis models makes this task challenging. This paper introduces an innovative hybrid model to quantify the pyrolysis potential of pine needles, predicting the entire process of their pyrolysis behavior. Through experimental analyses and kinetic parameter calculations of pine needle pyrolysis, the study employs a kinetic model with a chemical reaction mechanism. Additionally, it introduces an improved dung beetle optimization algorithm to accurately capture the primary trends in pine needle pyrolysis. The developed artificial neural network model incorporates meta-heuristic algorithms to address process error factors. Validation is based on experimental data from TG at three different heating rates. The results demonstrate that the hybrid model exhibits strong predictive performance compared to the standalone model, with coefficients of determination (R²) of 0.9999 and 0.999 for predicting the conversion degree and conversion rate of untrained data, respectively. Additionally, the standard errors of prediction (SEP) are 0.249% and 0.449% for predicting the conversion degree and conversion rate of untrained data, respectively.
ISSN:1930-2126
1930-2126
DOI:10.15376/biores.19.4.7513-7529