Dystopic neurohypophysis

• Published in: Endocrine pathology Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 72 - 78
• Main Authors: Aydin, Faruk, Ghatak, INitya R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-03-1994
• Subjects: Diabetes Insipidus; Endocrine Pathology Volume; Perinatal Injury; Pituitary Stalk; Median Eminence
• ISSN: 1046-3976; 1559-0097
• DOI: 10.1007/BF02921373

A dystopic neurohypophysis was noted incidentally at autopsy in a 51 -year-old man with no endocrine abnormality. The dystopic gland was situated in the upper region of the tuber cinereum and macroscopically simulated a neoplasm. The pituitary fossa contained only anterior hypophyseal elements. Review of the literature disclosed 19 such cases discovered at autopsy; 11 occurred in normal individuals with no endocrine abnormality. Radiological study revealed 145 additional cases. Except for the 6 occurrences described in normal individuals, the rest occurred in patients with anterior pituitary dysfunction. No instance of isolated diabetes insipidus has been reported due to dystopia of the neurohypophysis. Dystopia of the neurohypophysis in normal individuals should be distinguished from those occurring in patients with anterior pituitary abnormalities. The former represent a true dystopia and are not associated with perinatal injury, in contrast to the latter, which are acquired dystopias secondary to regeneration of the neurohypophysis and are associated with perinatal injury. Although anterior and posterior pituitary glands are formed by appositional growth, their development and functional status are entirely independent. Finally, the most significant clinical feature of dystopic neurohypophysis is the absence of any related symptoms and this condition should always be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis of hypothalamic lesions. In such patients, a surgical procedure may be avoided because other hypothalamic lesions, such as hamartomas and astrocytomas, are more frequently symptomatic.