Runoff and erosion following mechanical and chemical control of Creosotebush (Larrea tridentata)

Runoff and sediment yield were monitored from 1983 through 1986 on a range site dominated by creosotebush. The site was rootplowed and seeded, treated with tebuthiuron at 36 kg ai ha-1, or left untreated. Runoff from rootplowed and herbicide-treated plots was no different from untreated plots for 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 48 - 53
Main Authors: Wood, M.K. (New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM), Garcia, E.L, Tromble, J.M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America 01-01-1991
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Runoff and sediment yield were monitored from 1983 through 1986 on a range site dominated by creosotebush. The site was rootplowed and seeded, treated with tebuthiuron at 36 kg ai ha-1, or left untreated. Runoff from rootplowed and herbicide-treated plots was no different from untreated plots for 1 yr, but sediment yield from treated plots was lower than that from the untreated plots. Rootplowing and seeding increased sediment yield in the second year (1984), whereas treating with herbicide decreased sediment yield. Runoff and sediment yield during 1985 and 1986 were greatest from the untreated areas and least from the rootplowed and herbicide-treated areas. Total cover was nearly the same for each treatment. The untreated plots had 13% shrub cover; the others had none. Between shrubs in untreated plots, bare ground occupied large interconnected areas that contributed to the higher runoff and erosion rates.
Bibliography:P36
9316312
H60
ISSN:0890-037X
1550-2740
DOI:10.1017/S0890037X00033248