Sacroiliitis in familial Mediterranean fever: A rare joint involvement of the disease

Aim Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis. Sacroiliac joint involvement is rare in FMF patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of paediatrics and child health Vol. 60; no. 10; pp. 511 - 515
Main Authors: Özçelik, Emine, Çelikel, Elif, Tekin, Zahide Ekici, Güngörer, Vildan, Karagöl, Cüneyt, Kaplan, Melike Mehveş, Öner, Nimet, Polat, Merve Cansu, Öztürk, Didem, Ekici, Mehveş Işıklar, Es, Yasemin Uğur, Acar, Banu Çelikel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Australia John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01-10-2024
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis. Sacroiliac joint involvement is rare in FMF patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings of patients with FMF who developed sacroiliitis. Methods The files of paediatric patients aged 0–18 years who were followed up with a diagnosis of FMF were retrospectively reviewed. FMF patients with evidence of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Results Among 1062 FMF patients, 22 (12 males; median age 8.5) (2.1%) of them were found to have sacroiliitis. FMF was diagnosed before sacroiliitis in nine (40.9%) patients and after in 13 (59.1%) patients. The most common symptom in patients with sacroiliitis was low back pain (n = 21, 95.5%). In MEFV gene analysis, M694V was found in 16 (72.7%) patients and was the most common mutation. MRI showed evidence of sacroiliitis in all patients. All patients were using colchicine. Patients with FMF‐associated sacroiliitis, remission was achieved with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in 12 (54.5%), conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in six (27.3%) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in four (31.8%). Four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis when colchicine incompatible and four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis while using biologic agents for colchicine‐resistant FMF. Conclusions FMF‐associated sacroiliitis should be considered especially in patients with M694V mutation if they have symptoms such as low back pain. Colchicine‐resistant FMF patients should be evaluated for sacroiliitis symptoms at each visit.
Bibliography:Conflict of interest: None declared.
Author contributions: Conceptualisation: EÖ and BÇA; methodology: EÖ, BÇA, EÇ, ZET and VG; formal analysis and investigation: MCP, MIE, NÖ, DÖ and YUE; writing – original draft preparation: EÖ, BÇA, CK and ZET; writing – review and editing: EÖ, BÇA and VG; funding acquisition: none; resources: none; supervision: BÇA.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1034-4810
1440-1754
1440-1754
DOI:10.1111/jpc.16623