Scenario Design for the Evaluation of Human–Machine Interaction in Modular Process Plants

Operators in modular process plants face new demands due to features like increasing automation and digitalization combined with an architecture allowing for reconfigurations in short time spans. However, operators must be able to master process control tasks at all times. For research purposes on t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemical engineering & technology Vol. 47; no. 12
Main Authors: Miesen, Felix, Lorenz, Julius, Klose, Anselm, Pelzer, Florian, Narciss, Susanne, Urbas, Leon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frankfurt Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-12-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Operators in modular process plants face new demands due to features like increasing automation and digitalization combined with an architecture allowing for reconfigurations in short time spans. However, operators must be able to master process control tasks at all times. For research purposes on topics like supporting operators in their performance in process control of modular process plants, this article aims at developing scenarios of such plants. Based on three conceptual levels describing the relation of chemical processes and their modularized realization and a neutralization process as use case, four scenarios were developed. Having the common task to increase the throughput, the scenarios differ in terms of complexity and constraints that need to be considered for process control. This article deals with the step‐by‐step development of scenarios of modular process plants in the light of new requirements and challenges that operators face when working in and with such systems. The development includes considerations at the process, role, and equipment levels. The developed scenarios can be used for research related to process control in modular process plants.
ISSN:0930-7516
1521-4125
DOI:10.1002/ceat.202400015