Reliability of measurements on virtual models obtained from scanning of impressions and conventional plaster models

• Published in: Brazilian journal of oral sciences Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 297 - 302
• Main Authors: Moreira, Débora Duarte, Gribel, Bruno Frazão, Torres, Gina Delia Roque, Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria, Freitas, Deborah Queiroz de, Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP 01-12-2014
• Subjects: DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; dental models; diagnosis; orthodontics; digitalis
• ISSN: 1677-3225; 1677-3225
• DOI: 10.1590/1677-3225v13n4a11

Aim: To evaluate the reliability of linear measurements in virtual models by comparing measurements performed on virtual models obtained from alginate impression scans, plaster model and measurements performed on conventional plaster model. Methods: The sample comprised 26 randomly selected patients to have impressions of their upper and lower jaws taken using alginate and their bite registration using a wax bite. The virtual models were obtained by scanning the alginate impression and the plaster model in a laser surface scanner (R700; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark), and the measurements were performed using the Ortho Analyser (3Shape) proprietary software. The linear measurements of the size of the teeth mesial to distal, arch perimeter, intercanine distance and intermolar distance in the upper and lower arches were performed on plaster models, digital impressions and digital models, by three observers and repeated after 15 days on 8 models for intra-observer evaluations. Data were tabulated and analyzed statistically. Intra-class correlation to check the agreement of intra and inter-observers and ANOVA test were used to analyze the differences between measurements of digital models from impression and digital models from plaster. Results: The results showed a statistically significant difference (pd"0.05) for the posterior teeth, anterior teeth, upper arch perimeter and lower inter-canine distance, comparing the digital models with plaster models, but these differences are considered clinically non-significant. Conclusions: Digital models were proven be reliable and clinically acceptable for measuring tooth width, perimeter arches, intercanine and intermolar distances.