Prophylactic cosyntropin after unintentional dural puncture and incidence of post-dural puncture headache and epidural blood patch use: A retrospective cohort study (2019–2022)
•Cosyntropin has been suggested to reduce PDPH and need for epidural blood patch.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not reduce the incidence of PDPH.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not decrease the need for epidural blood patch.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not increase hyperglycemic/hypertensive events. C...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of obstetric anesthesia Vol. 60; p. 104262 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier Ltd
01-11-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Cosyntropin has been suggested to reduce PDPH and need for epidural blood patch.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not reduce the incidence of PDPH.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not decrease the need for epidural blood patch.•Prophylactic cosyntropin did not increase hyperglycemic/hypertensive events.
Cosyntropin has been suggested to decrease the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) by increasing the production of cerebrospinal fluid. This study examined the association of prophylactic cosyntropin administration with the incidence of PDPH and its management with an epidural blood patch after an unintentional dural puncture (UDP).
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cases with UDP during placement of neuraxial labor analgesia. Per institutional practice and at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, intravenous cosyntropin 1 mg may be administered for PDPH prophylaxis. PDPH, time from UDP to cosyntropin administration, time to development of PDPH, and management with epidural blood patch(es) were recorded.
Cosyntropin was administered in 164 of 234 (70%) cases with UDP. PDPH occurred 98/164 (60%) with cosyntropin and 45/70 (64%) without cosyntropin (p = 0.66). The PDPH adjusted incidence was 53% with cosyntropin and 62% without cosyntropin, difference 9% (95% CI −6% to 24%, p = 0.25). The adjusted epidural blood patch rate was 66% with cosyntropin and 78% without cosyntropin, difference of 12% (95% CI −5% to 28%, p = 0.17).
Prophylactic cosyntropin following UDP was not associated with a significant decrease in PDPH rate or use of epidural blood patch for management of PDPH. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse hyperglycemic or hypertensive events amongst those who did or did not receive cosyntropin. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0959-289X 1532-3374 1532-3374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104262 |