Improving Pinus taeda site index from rotation to rotation with silvicultural treatments

• Published in: Forest ecology and management Vol. 526; p. 120581
• Main Authors: Albaugh, Timothy J., Carter, David R., Cook, Rachel L., Campoe, Otávio C., Rubilar, Rafael A., Creighton, Jerre L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15-12-2022
• Subjects: Basal area; Diameter; Dominant height; Loblolly pine; Planting density; Value; Value; Basal area; Loblolly pine; Planting density; Dominant height; Diameter
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120581

•Nitrogen fertilization and planting density did not affect site index at this site.•Site index increased from 16.8 m to 24.2 m at 25 years of age.•Increased site index was attributed to P fertilization, competition control, genetics and environment.•Productivity estimates may be more useful than site index with intensive management.
We wanted to improve site index using fertilizer applications and planting density at a site with a site index of 16.8 m at a base age of 25 years. We installed a randomized complete block study in the Virginia Piedmont with three replications of three levels of fertilization (cumulative elemental nitrogen and phosphorous amounts of 0 and 45, 309 and 73, and 787 and 129 kg ha−1, respectively) and two levels of planting density (896 and 1793 trees ha−1). We measured the stand 15 times and completed our analysis after age 22 measurements. Fertilization and planting density did not affect site index and there was no planting density by fertilization interaction. Fertilizer significantly increased stem diameter and basal area but did not affect dominant height. Low planting density resulted in significantly larger diameter trees with longer crowns, but with less basal area and stand scale production than the high planting density. However, site index in all treatments improved to 24.2 m, a 7.4 m increase from one rotation to the next. We attributed the increase in site index to adding the primary limiting resource (phosphorous), better competition control, genetics and growing environment. Silvicultural inputs and environmental conditions influence site index and estimates of productivity (e.g. m3 ha−1 yr−1) may be more useful.