The Philippines’ COVID-19 Response Securitising the Pandemic and Disciplining the Pasaway
The Philippine response to COVID-19 has been described as being one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in the world. Why has the Philippine government relied heavily on draconian measures in its “war” against COVID-19? And what discourse informed the framing of its response as a war against the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 224 - 244 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01-08-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Philippine response to COVID-19 has been described as being one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in the world. Why has the Philippine government relied heavily on draconian measures in its “war” against COVID-19? And what discourse informed the framing of its response as a war against the virus? This article argues that the government’s reliance on draconian measures was a consequence of securitising COVID-19, appreciating the virus as an “existential threat.” The securitisation of COVID-19 was reinforced with a narrative characterising the situation of the country as being at war against an “unseen enemy.” This war-like narrative, however, invariably produced a subject, the pasaway. As the perpetual enemy of health and order, the pasaway became the target of disciplining and policing. The targeting of the pasaway was informed by deep-seated class prejudices and Duterte’s authoritarian tendencies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1868-1034 1868-4882 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1868103421994261 |