The prospects of litigation to secure maternal health in Nigeria: Does SERAP v Attorney-General Lagos have any value?

• Published in: African human rights law journal Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 278 - 302
• Main Author: Olayanju, Oluseyi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hatfield University of Pretoria 2023
• Subjects: Anemia; Appreciation; Blood donors; Blood transfusions; Constitutions; Court decisions; Health care policy; Health services; Health status; Hemorrhage; Human rights; Legislation; Litigation; Maternal & child health; Maternal characteristics; Maternal mortality; Mortality; Pregnancy; Spouses; State courts; Value; Women; Nigeria
• ISSN: 1609-073X; 1996-2096
• DOI: 10.17159/1996-2096/2023/v23n2a3

Blood transfusions play a crucial role in addressing obstetric complications such as post-partum haemorrhage and anaemia that contribute to maternal deaths. The right to health guaranteed by numerous international human rights instruments, national constitutions and legislation obligates governments to ensure that women have access to interventions to prevent maternal mortality. In 2020 a health policy in Lagos State, Nigeria, providing that, in the event that patients are likely to need a blood transfusion, such as pregnant women, spouses and relatives are required to donate blood as a condition for accessing maternity and health services in government-run health facilities, was the subject of a High Court ruling. The judgment declared the policy to be a breach of some human rights guaranteed by the Nigerian Constitution, legislation and international instruments that the country had ratified. Additionally, the judge noted that the policy contributed to maternal deaths. Consequent to the above, this article explores the contribution of human rights litigation and the ensuing verdicts to the protection of maternal health globally, and in light of these evaluates the value of the judgment in particular. A few national and international cases involving other countries that depict the strides that have been made in the use of human rights litigation to protect maternal health are presented to enable an appreciation of the extent to which human rights litigation has been used to support maternal mortality reduction efforts. A critical appraisal of the Lagos State court's decision with a view to determining its potential to contribute to maternal mortality reduction efforts in Nigeria and elsewhere is then embarked upon. The finding is that despite certain flaws identified in the judgment, it makes a valuable contribution to the protection of maternal health and, by extension, the reduction of maternal mortality in Nigeria.