Comparative analysis of the performance of mixed terraces and level and graded terraces

The terracing of agricultural land is the most widespread mechanical practice used among farmers in the control of water erosion. The objective of this paper was to carry out a comparative analysis between mixed terraces and level and graded terraces. The dimensioning of level terraces was carried o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta scientiarum. Agronomy Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 351 - 357
Main Authors: Oliveira, Josiane Rosa Silva de, Pruski, Fernando Falco, Silva, José Márcio Alves da, Silva, Danilo Paulúcio da
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM 01-12-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The terracing of agricultural land is the most widespread mechanical practice used among farmers in the control of water erosion. The objective of this paper was to carry out a comparative analysis between mixed terraces and level and graded terraces. The dimensioning of level terraces was carried out based on the surface runoff volume, while the graded terrace dimensions were based on the maximum runoff flow rate. For the mixed terraces, the dimensioning was carried by considering two surface runoff hydrographs, one for the determination of the terrace channel capacity and another to estimate the flow rate at the extremity of the terrace channel. Therefore, in order to contain and transport the excess volume, an additional value was calculated and added to the depth of the channel. A case study was performed for the Uberaba, Minas Gerais State (Brazil) rainfall conditions, considering events with return periods of 10, 30, and 50 years. The obtained results provided quantitative evidence that mixedterraceshave a lowerheight thanlevel terraces anda higher level than the graded terraces, resulting indirect consequencesfor the soil movement for the terrace construction.
ISSN:1679-9275
1807-8621
1807-8621
DOI:10.4025/actasciagron.v34i4.14755