Erratum: “Systematics in the Cepheid and TRGB Distance Scales: Metallicity Sensitivity of the Wesenheit Leavitt Law” (2024, ApJ, 961, 166)

Updates and corrections are made to a number of numerical entries and their references in Table 1 of the published article. Updated plots of the final run of the comparison of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) and Cepheid distances with metallicity, as seen in the lower panels of Figures 1 and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal Vol. 970; no. 2; pp. 193 - 194
Main Authors: Madore, Barry F., Freedman, Wendy L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Philadelphia The American Astronomical Society 01-08-2024
IOP Publishing
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Updates and corrections are made to a number of numerical entries and their references in Table 1 of the published article. Updated plots of the final run of the comparison of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) and Cepheid distances with metallicity, as seen in the lower panels of Figures 1 and 2 in the published article, are shown in the composite figure given here (Figure 1). The main conclusion of the published article, that there is no statistically significant correlation of the zero-point of the Cepheid period–luminosity relation with metallicity, is unchanged. The updated “statistically flat” regression is now found to be Δ μ o (Cepheid − TRGB) = −0.028 (±0.019) × ([O/H] − 8.50) − 0.014 (±0.042).
Bibliography:Stars and Stellar Physics
AAS56618
correction
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6265