Erratum: “Systematics in the Cepheid and TRGB Distance Scales: Metallicity Sensitivity of the Wesenheit Leavitt Law” (2024, ApJ, 961, 166)
Updates and corrections are made to a number of numerical entries and their references in Table 1 of the published article. Updated plots of the final run of the comparison of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) and Cepheid distances with metallicity, as seen in the lower panels of Figures 1 and...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal Vol. 970; no. 2; pp. 193 - 194 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Philadelphia
The American Astronomical Society
01-08-2024
IOP Publishing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Updates and corrections are made to a number of numerical entries and their references in Table 1 of the published article. Updated plots of the final run of the comparison of the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) and Cepheid distances with metallicity, as seen in the lower panels of Figures 1 and 2 in the published article, are shown in the composite figure given here (Figure 1). The main conclusion of the published article, that there is no statistically significant correlation of the zero-point of the Cepheid period–luminosity relation with metallicity, is unchanged. The updated “statistically flat” regression is now found to be Δ μ o (Cepheid − TRGB) = −0.028 (±0.019) × ([O/H] − 8.50) − 0.014 (±0.042). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Stars and Stellar Physics AAS56618 correction |
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6265 |