Vulnerability assessment of natural heritage in the North-Eastern Ecuadorian Amazon using land use cover and nature protection status

• Published in: Journal for nature conservation Vol. 81; p. 126686
• Main Authors: Durango-Cordero, J., Saqalli, M., Bonilla-Bedoya, S., Elger, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier GmbH 01-09-2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: Biodiversity value; Environment and Society; Environmental Sciences; Geography; Humanities and Social Sciences; Land use/land cover; Natural heritage conservation; Protected areas; Spatial analysis; Protected areas; Natural heritage conservation; Spatial analysis; Biodiversity value; Land use/land cover
• ISSN: 1617-1381
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126686

This study evaluates the vulnerability of natural heritage in the Northeast Ecuadorian Amazon (NEA), from the perspective of intrinsic vulnerability. Therefore, two proxy indicators of vulnerability were established: (i) the ecological integrity vulnerability index (EIVI), indicating the potential loss of ecological integrity, assessed by protection status (2018); (ii) the biological diversity vulnerability index (BVI), deriving the potential loss of biological diversity, using land cover/land use (2014). Biodiversity values were derived with land cover-related biodiversity data, and (iii) and compared with spatial congruence/correlation between (i) and (ii). The EIVI was directly derived using protection status, which defines vulnerability levels by ranking them according to corresponding levels of anthropic development allowance. A robust relationship between land use classes and species richness was found for both endemic vascular plants in neotropical regions and multi-taxa in tropical forests worldwide, validating the BVI. Furthermore, the moderate spatial correlation between protection status and land cover (r = 0.52) may be partially explained by 3,060 km2 of unprotected primary forest. Overall, 42 % of the NEA have a high degree of congruence between potential biodiversity and protection status. In conclusion, this study provides insights into nature conservation efforts in areas with sparse biodiversity data using readily available geographic information.