The theodicies of Hans Jonas and Jürgen Moltmann: Proposing an alternative reformed angle

• Published in: In die skriflig : tydskrif van die Gereformeerde Teologiese Vereniging Vol. 58; no. 1; pp. e1 - e8
• Main Author: Vorster, Nico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Afrikaans; English
• Published: Potchefstroom African Online Scientific Information Systems (Pty) Ltd t/a AOSIS 01-01-2024; AOSIS (Pty) Ltd; AOSIS
• Subjects: Adventure; auschwitz; divine nature; God; hans jonas; Holocaust; Jonas, Hans; jürgen moltmann; Nazi era; Suffering; Theodicy; Theology; World War II
• ISSN: 1018-6441; 2305-0853
• DOI: 10.4102/ids.v58i1.3088

Auschwitz had a profound impact on the theological landscape. It led to God’s lordship, goodness and power being put on trial. If God exists and if he is a good and powerful God, why did he not intervene to stop the atrocities committed during the Holocaust? The theologies of the Jewish philosopher Hans Jonas and the Christian theologian Jürgen Moltmann were decisively structured by these questions.Contribution: This article compares the theodicies of these two influential thinkers within the Jewish and Christian traditions by analysing their concepts of God, the nature of the cosmos and human history as well as their respective views on God’s response to suffering. Despite showing appreciation for profound insights, this article points out impasses in their arguments. Drawing on a reformed approach to the question, the article concludes that the anthropodicy question is the real elephant in the room, not the theodicy question. Instead of asking questions about God’s goodness, Reformed theology posits the incomprehensibility of human beings turning against God. We must ask: How does it happen that a self-conscious being possessing innate moral capacities, such as moral emotions and vicarious intersubjective capabilities, rebels against God and engage in atrocious acts? Seen from this perspective, the theodicy question seems to be undergirded by the human propensity to moral disengagement and blame-shifting. Perhaps, instead of putting God on trial, humans must resort to introspection.