Dynamic Navigation System for Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxillary Aesthetic Region

• Published in: Applied sciences Vol. 12; no. 11; p. 5510
• Main Authors: Battista, Eric, Gasparro, Roberta, Cacciola, Maria, Sammartino, Gilberto, Marenzi, Gaetano
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 29-05-2022
• Subjects: Accuracy; Bone surgery; Complications; Computed tomography; dental implants; Deviation; dynamic computer-assisted implant placement; Maxilla; navigation system; Navigation systems; Patient satisfaction; Planning; Position measurement; Prostheses; Software; Substance abuse treatment; Surgeons; Surgical outcomes; Teeth; Transplants & implants; Workflow; Switzerland
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app12115510

(1) Background: The achievement of an optimal implant position is still a critical consideration in implantology, especially in the aesthetic area. Dynamic navigation is a computer-aided procedure that allows the surgeon to follow on a screen the three-dimensional position of instruments in real time during implant site preparation. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the clinical and radiographical performance and accuracy of the surgical workflow during maxillary immediate implant placement assisted by DTX studio Implant software planning and X-Guide Navigation. (2) Methods: Twelve consecutive patients requiring at least one implant in the maxillary aesthetic region were treated. Clinical outcome measures were biological complications and implant or prosthetic success rate. The accuracy was measured by calculating the deviation between the real implant position obtained from the postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and the planned implant position. (3) Results: The average deviation at the implant shoulder was 0.77 ± 0.25 mm and at the apical point was 1.2 ± 0.61 mm. The depth error was 0.5 ± 0.21 mm. The axis deviation was 2.5 ± 0.41 degrees. No biological complications or implant and prosthetic failures occurred after mean 6-month follow-up. (4) Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it seems that the dynamic navigation system for implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic region is accurate for prosthetically driven implant placement.