Ethical and institutional frameworks for interactional justice in public organizations: a comparative analysis of selected Western and Chinese sources

• Published in: Journal of global ethics Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 339 - 350
• Main Author: Rivera, Mario A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Routledge 02-09-2014
• Subjects: China; communicative ethics; Comparative analysis; Confucianism; contemporary Chinese ethics; contractarian ethics; ethical overridingness; Ethics; Institutionalism; Justice; Philosophy; transactional justice
• ISSN: 1744-9626; 1744-9634
• DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2014.973993

This paper explores both differences and points of contact between selected contemporary theories of public ethics in the West and China. China is in a greater state of flux in this connection, with new, eclectic approaches to ethical justification for moral agency gaining prominence. There are thematic parallels between East and West in their distinct strains of institutionalism (in which neither individual moral agency nor the justice claims of individuals have much play). However, there are recent Chinese theoretical proposals - many incorporating Western sources - that address this quandary, namely the institutional overdetermination of moral agency. These proposals are joined to contributions from feminist and liberation ethics in a critical reconsideration of overridingness in formal ethics. Contemporary Chinese ethics connect moral claims to kin, community, and reciprocity networks, particularly as traditional philosophy is recovered in new theoretical syntheses. The grounding of Confucian ethics in kin and community offers an instructive contrast to formal Western ethical systems, as do radical strains of Western ethics that suggest that transcendence is found in the self's extension toward others in need. This paper considers these ethical themes in connection with hypothetical instances of interactional justice in organizations.