Lower hepatotoxicity risk in Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40 agonist, compared to Fasiglifam for type 2 diabetes therapy

Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy Vol. 181; p. 117674
Main Authors: Yoon, Jongmin, Song, Haengjin, Park, Ji Soo, Kim, Jeong Ho, Jun, Yearin, Gim, Sang-Ah, Hong, Changhee, An, Kyung Mi, Park, Joon-Tae, Lee, Jung Woo, Yoon, Hongchul, Kim, Yun Seok, Kim, Sang Geon
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Masson SAS 01-12-2024
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolite formation, and covalent binding to proteins. In the hepatobiliary transporter assay, Xelaglifam showed a broader safety margin (>10-fold) against bile acid transporters, suggesting its less likelihood to cause bile acids accumulation, unlike Fasiglifam (<10-fold safety margin). Moreover, Xelaglifam showed no effect on glycocholic acid accumulation at higher concentrations than the estimated Cmax in the 3D human liver model, whereas Fasiglifam affected the accumulation. In the HepaRG spheroids 3D model, the AC50 values of Xelaglifam for mitochondrial function-related parameters were higher than Fasiglifam. Unlike Fasiglifam, none of the cell parameters for Xelaglifam were below the estimated 5x Cmax. Additionally, the glucuronide metabolite of Xelaglifam was negligible (<1 % of the parent) in the Safety Testing, indicating a limited contribution to DILI. Fasiglifam activated genes related to liver disease, whereas Xelaglifam had no effect; instead, it increased FXR activity, a bile acid regulator. Notably, toxicity studies in rats and monkeys showed no adverse liver effects at higher exposure levels than the effective human blood concentration. Overall, these results support a low risk of DILI for Xelaglifam treatment and the justification for its long-term use for treating type 2 diabetes. [Display omitted] •Xelaglifam is a novel GPR40 agonist and has a lower risk of hepatotoxicity compared to fasiglifam.•Xelaglifam has a lower risk of transporter inhibition and mitochondrial toxicity.•Xelaglifam has lower glucuronide metabolite production and risk of covalent binding.•Xelaglifam has no effect on liver disease-related gene activity, instead, it increases FXR activity.•Xelaglifam has no effect on the liver, even at exposures above the effective blood concentration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0753-3322
1950-6007
1950-6007
DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117674