Gefitinib Versus Pemetrexed as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (KCSG-LU08-01): An Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

Gefitinib was compared with pemetrexed as second-line therapy in a clinically selected population previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. A phase 3 trial of gefitinib (250 mg/day) versus pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks) was conducted in patients who had never smoked and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer Vol. 118; no. 24; pp. 6234 - 6242
Main Authors: SUN, Jong-Mu, KI HYEONG LEE, IN GYU HWANG, LEE, Keehyun, SOOK JUNG JO, JAE WON LEE, JIN SEOK AHN, PARK, Keunchil, AHN, Myung-Ju, KIM, Sang-We, DAE HO LEE, YOUNG JOO MIN, HWAN JUNG YUN, HOON KYO KIM, HONG SUK SONG, YEUL HONG KIM, KIM, Bong-Seog
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell 15-12-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Gefitinib was compared with pemetrexed as second-line therapy in a clinically selected population previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. A phase 3 trial of gefitinib (250 mg/day) versus pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks) was conducted in patients who had never smoked and who had advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated with 1 previous platinum-based regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 135 patients were analyzed. The gefitinib group had significantly longer PFS compared with the pemetrexed group, with a median PFS time of 9.0 versus 3.0 months (P = .0006). The objective response rates were 58.8% and 22.4% for gefitinib and pemetrexed, respectively (P < .001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the 2 groups (22.2 vs 18.9 months; P = .37). The difference of PFS was increased in a subgroup analysis of 33 patients with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (15.7 vs 2.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.72; P = .005), with numerical superiority of gefitinib in the 38 patients testing negative for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (5.9 vs 2.7 months; P = .099). Both regimens were well tolerated. There were no significantly different changes in quality of life between the 2 groups, except that symptom scores for dyspnea and diarrhea favored the gefitinib and pemetrexed arms, respectively. Gefitinib showed superior efficacy to pemetrexed as second-line therapy in Korean never-smokers with pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.27630