Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws

• Published in: Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 485 - 491
• Main Authors: Traynelis, Vincent C, Sherman, Jonathan, Nottmeier, Eric, Singh, Vaneet, McGilvray, Kirk, Puttlitz, Christian M, Leahy, Patrick Devin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-05-2014
• Subjects: Bone Screws; Cadaver; Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery; Diskectomy - instrumentation; Diskectomy - methods; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology; Rotation; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation; Spinal Fusion - methods; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiopathology; Zygapophyseal Joint - surgery
• ISSN: 1547-5646
• DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13837

OBJECT The clinical success rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures are substantially reduced as more cervical levels are included in the fusion procedure. One method that has been proposed as an adjunctive technique for multilevel ACDF is the placement of screws across the facet joints ("transfacet screws"). However, the biomechanical stability imparted by transfacet screw placement (either unilaterally or bilaterally) has not been reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the acute stability conferred by implementation of unilateral and bilateral transfacet screws to an ACDF construct. METHODS Eight C2-T1 fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (3 female and 5 male; mean age 50 years) were tested. Three different instrumentation variants were performed on cadaveric cervical spines across C4-7: 1) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation; 2) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation with unilateral facet screw placement; and 3) ACDF with an intervertebral spacer and standard plate/screw instrumentation with bilateral facet screw placement. Kinetic ranges of motion in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at 1.5 Nm were captured after each of these procedures and were statistically analyzed for significance. RESULTS All 3 fixation scenarios produced statistically significant reductions (p < 0.05) in all 3 bending planes compared with the intact condition. The addition of a unilateral facet screw to the ACDF construct produced significant reductions at the C4-5 and C6-7 levels in lateral bending and axial rotation but not in flexion-extension motion. Bilateral facet screw fixation did not produce any statistically significant decreases in flexion-extension motion compared with unilateral facet screw fixation. However, in lateral bending, significant reductions at the C4-5 and C5-6 levels were observed with the addition of a second facet screw. The untreated, adjacent levels (C2-3, C3-4, and C7-1) did not demonstrate significant differences in range of motion. CONCLUSIONS The data demonstrated that adjunctive unilateral facet screw fixation to an ACDF construct provides significant gains in stability and should be considered a potential option for increasing the likelihood for obtaining a successful arthrodesis for multilevel ACDF procedures.