Comparing the 1st and 2nd moment approaches to variance reduction in Monte Carlo: Two examples

•The employment of the adjoint flux to execute variance reduction in Monte Carlo is evaluated.•Variance reduction with the adjoint flux is benchmarked against a method based on the 2nd moment.•The variance reduction is made within a reactor core eigenvalue calculation.•Two test problems, both contai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of nuclear energy Vol. 186; p. 109745
Main Author: Burn, K.W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 15-06-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The employment of the adjoint flux to execute variance reduction in Monte Carlo is evaluated.•Variance reduction with the adjoint flux is benchmarked against a method based on the 2nd moment.•The variance reduction is made within a reactor core eigenvalue calculation.•Two test problems, both containing an activation cross-section with high, nattow resonances, based on the VERA computation benchmark are used.•Differences in the figure-of-merit of factors of 50 and 7 respectively are observed. Variance reduction in Monte Carlo particle transport calculations nearly always relies on the generation of information based on the first moment (viz. the adjoint flux or importance). In this paper we revisit the question of the non-optimal nature of this approach. Whilst it has already been shown to be deficient in duct streaming problems, we look at another kind of problem, namely the activation of nuclides whose cross-sections contain resonances. As a benchmark a second moment-based approach that gives near-optimum results is employed. We find important differences in efficiency between the first and second-moment-based approaches. Some discussion is made on the reasons for these differences.
ISSN:0306-4549
1873-2100
DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2023.109745