The problematic but seductive call of prerogative power
This article investigates and critiques the view that Lockean prerogative power is or should be incorporated, legally or extralegally, into the American constitutional system. Some scholars argue that extraconstitutional prerogative represents a safer alternative to a broad legal reading of presiden...
Saved in:
Published in: | Presidential studies quarterly Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 332 - 349 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington
Center for the Study of the Presidency
01-09-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This article investigates and critiques the view that Lockean prerogative power is or should be incorporated, legally or extralegally, into the American constitutional system. Some scholars argue that extraconstitutional prerogative represents a safer alternative to a broad legal reading of presidential power, as it creates fewer precedents. Others suggest that the Framers “constitutionalized prerogative.” Both of these views have difficulties because ultimately, prerogative can create more dangerous precedents than legal uses of presidential power. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-4918 1741-5705 |
DOI: | 10.1111/psq.12883 |