Transglutaminase–mucin binding dynamics in gastrointestinal mucus: Interfacial behaviour, thermodynamics and gelation mechanism

• Published in: Journal of molecular liquids Vol. 413; p. 126039
• Main Authors: Ahmad, Mehraj, Bushra, Rani, Seidi, Farzad, Ritzoulis, Christos, Huang, Meigui, Song, Junlong, Jin, Yongcan, Xiao, Huining
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01-11-2024
• Subjects: Gastrointestinal mucus; Molecular interactions; Mucin; Rheology; Thermodynamics; Transglutaminase; Gastrointestinal mucus; Thermodynamics; Transglutaminase; Mucin; Rheology; Molecular interactions
• ISSN: 0167-7322
• DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126039

[Display omitted]
•SPR indicated robust TGM−PGM binding with high surface density and low KD values at pH 7.•At pH 3, TGM exhibits weak adherence to PGM, yielding low surface density and high KD values.•Fluorimetry reveals temperature-dependent dynamic binding between PGM and TGM.•Thermodynamics display spontaneous (ΔG < 0) and endothermic interaction (ΔH > 0) between PGM and TGM.•PGM and TGM interaction enhances shear viscosity, melting point, and viscoelastic moduli of the binary complex.
Transglutaminase, an enzyme present in epithelial cells and as a residual component in processed foods, is hypothesised to interact with gastrointestinal mucus, impacting its structure and function. To test the physical validity of this phenomenon, this study investigates the binding kinetics and thermodynamics between porcine gastric mucin (PGM) and microbial transglumatinse (TGM) in a model gastrointestinal mucus, followed by the rheological analysis of the resulting systems. At pH 7, TGM exhibited pronounced binding with the PGM interface, characterised by a high surface density (55.34 ± 1.86 µg/m−2) and a low dissociation constant (KD ∼ 4.03 ± 0.10 μM) as determined by surface plasma resonance (SPR). Conversely, at pH 3, TGM showed weak adhesion onto PGM, resulting in a less stable binding, reflected by a lower surface density (10.94 ± 0.67 µg/m−2) and a higher dissociation constant (KD ∼ 6.24 ± 0.22 μM). Regardless of the nature of interaction, the Hill coefficients (nH ≥ 1) indicated that the binding sites were markedly denser at pH 7 (1383.38 ± 46.47 pmol/m−2), than at pH 3 (273.68 ± 16.84 pmol/m−2). Fluorimetry analysis suggested temperature-dependent dynamic binding between PGM and TGM. The resulting Benesi – Hildebrand plots illustrated a linear correlation between PGM and increasing TGM concentration, suggesting a single-step interaction mechanism. The calculated thermodynamic parameters indicated spontaneous interaction between PGM and TGM (ΔG < 0) via endothermic (entropic) interactions (ΔH > 0). Notably, hydrophobic forces played a significant role in the network stabilisation of PGM−TGM complex (ΔS > 0). Rheometry analysis elucidates that the interaction maxima within TGM−PGM systems substantially elevate both shear viscosity (η), and the melting point (Tm), shifting from 6.75 ± 0.28 to 70.94 ± 2.21 (×10−3) Pa s (at 1 s−1), and 36.80 ± 0.80 to 48.20 ± 0.11 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the coexistence of these two macromolecular species results in a 3- to 4-fold dramatic increase in the viscoelastic moduli of the binary complex. These findings build a strong physicochemical basis for the interaction between TGM and PGM, with profound effects on the rhological behaviour of the latter; it also highlights the need to examine the biochemical/enzymatic aspects of said interactions, and their potential effects on mucosa and human physiology.