Densification of a fermented lignocellulosic biomass rich in cellulolytic enzymes

This study was conducted to compare the performance of two densification processes, namely pelletization and granulation, on quality parameters (enzyme activity and density) of a beta-glucanase-rich biomass, processing time/material throughput, and power consumption. The pellet mill heating conditio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian biosystems engineering Vol. 58; no. 1; pp. 3 - 3.8
Main Authors: Soleimani, Majid, Tabil, Lope, Campbell, Leigh, Hynes, Russell, Dumonceaux, Tim
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Saskatoon Canadian Society for Engineering in Agriculture, Food, and Biological Systems 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study was conducted to compare the performance of two densification processes, namely pelletization and granulation, on quality parameters (enzyme activity and density) of a beta-glucanase-rich biomass, processing time/material throughput, and power consumption. The pellet mill heating condition (dry heating and steam conditioning settings) had more effect on the product quality parameters than the storage temperature (ranging from -18ºC to 45ºC) of biomass during pelletization. In pelletization, the factor of heating source (dry and steam heating) was more effective than the factor of biomass initial temperature (ranged from -18ºC to 45ºC) on the quality parameters. In no-heat or dry-heat (temperatures of up to 55ºC) and low-flow steam conditioning, enzyme activities of over 90% were obtained. However, at the high-flow steam conditioning, a lower material throughput, higher power consumption, and a complete loss of enzyme activity was obtained. In granulation, the factor of moisture content (MC) was more important than binder inclusion, material residence, and extrusion direction in affecting product quality parameters. Compared to pelletization, granulation would be a preferable process resulting in a uniform and small-sized densified product. However, it has higher energy consumption and less efficiency in terms of product densification.
ISSN:1492-9058
1492-9066
DOI:10.7451/CBE.2016.58.3.1