Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of coconut-shell liquid smoke to maintain the texture of fresh meat

This research focused on the evaluation of raw broiler chicken meat texture and pathogenic antibacterial effect under the treatment of grade 2 coconut-shell liquid smoke (CSLS) as a food preservative. Compound identification of grade 2 CSLS was conducted using the GC-MS method. The main chemical com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in food science, sustainable agriculture, and agroindustrial engineering Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 194 - 202
Main Authors: Purwantisari, Susiana, Nur Jannah, Siti, Nabilla Fikri, Dzakiyya, Aulia Wulandari, Sukma, Yohana, Eflita, Setiyana, Budi, Ardiansari, Anindya, Ikhlasul Amal, Daffa, Dwi Ariyanto, Hermawan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Brawijaya, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian 30-06-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This research focused on the evaluation of raw broiler chicken meat texture and pathogenic antibacterial effect under the treatment of grade 2 coconut-shell liquid smoke (CSLS) as a food preservative. Compound identification of grade 2 CSLS was conducted using the GC-MS method. The main chemical compounds of CSLS were polyunsaturated fatty acid derivates, fatty acid and phenol. The evaluation of texture was conducted on raw broiler chicken meat under the treatment of grade 2 CSLS during storage at 25 ℃ for 7 days. The effect of antibacterial activity of grade 2 CSLS with different concentration (i.e., 5%, 25%, 50%, and 75%) were tested using Gram-positive bacteria on several pathogenic bacteria such as L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, P. Aeruginosa, and E. coli. The results indicated that grade 2 CSLS influenced the inhibited zone of L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, P. Aeruginosa, and E. coli respectively with linear correlation. The optimal concentration of grade 2 CSLS resulted in a concentration of 50%, which was the most optimal against L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, P. Aeruginosa, and E. coli as pathogenic bacteria strains.
ISSN:2622-5921
2622-5921
DOI:10.21776/ub.afssaae.2024.007.02.8