Assessing the Impact of Behavioral Sciences Interventions on Chronic Disease Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 21; no. 7; p. 837
• Main Authors: Corrêa, Rafael, Froner, Matheus Britto, Tabak, Benjamin Miranda
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 27-06-2024
• Subjects: Behavior; Behavioral economics; Behavioral sciences; Chronic illnesses; Clinical trials; Colonoscopy; COVID-19; Decision making; Disease transmission; Evidence based librarianship; Health care; Medical screening; Patient compliance; Personal health; Physicians; Preventive medicine; Primary care; Public health; Rationality; Systematic review; behavioral sciences; self-management; chronic disease; prevention; public health
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21070837

Studies have highlighted the importance of applying Behavioral Sciences interventions to develop equity in the prevention of chronic diseases in the public health domain. Our study aims to assess the evidence of this influence. We undertook a systematic review study using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane, searching for work published between 2013 and 2023. The research analyzed the influence of Behavioral Sciences intervention studies on public health. This review was registered and published in PROSPERO, registration number CRD42023412377. The systematic search identified 2951 articles. The review analyzed 26 studies. The quality assessment of the articles showed an overall average of 74%, with the majority of studies being of high quality. The interventions with the best evidence for chronic diseases used framing messages, nudges and vouchers. Messages with incentives also showed satisfactory evidence. The most prevalent outcomes were related to screening tests and patient adherence to treatment. The current state of decision-making remains mainly at the patient level, with potential for further exploration of the roles of healthcare professionals and decision-makers in future research efforts. Limitations relate to the heterogeneity of the study sample, which hinders a more precise analysis of specific interventions and outcomes in chronic diseases.