Biological UV Dosimeters in Quality Control of Tanning Tubes

ABSTRACT Although according to the International Radiological Protection Association–International Non‐Ionizing Radiation Committee recommendation (1991) the use of sunbeds for cosmetic purposes is not recommended, tanning devices are used widely. Ten different types of commercially available sunbed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Photochemistry and photobiology Vol. 76; no. 4; pp. 391 - 396
Main Authors: Kuluncsics, Z., Kerékgyártó, T., Gróf, P., Horkay, I., Rontó, Gy
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-10-2002
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Although according to the International Radiological Protection Association–International Non‐Ionizing Radiation Committee recommendation (1991) the use of sunbeds for cosmetic purposes is not recommended, tanning devices are used widely. Ten different types of commercially available sunbed tubes have been studied using a uracil biological UV dosimeter, and three of them were analyzed in detail. Dimerization effectiveness of the tubes was measured directly, whereas efficiency of erythema induction was calculated weighting the emission spectra by the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage erythema action spectrum. The data obtained demonstrate that quality control of sunbed tubes has to include not only the determination of the UV doses administered but also the assessment of the health risk due to the UVB and UVA components of the lamp. A method of quality control using the uracil biological dosimeter was elaborated, and the estimation of the “acceptable” exposure time was checked/controlled on 15 volunteers by assessing individually the erythema induction threshold. A correct classification of the sunbed tubes is proposed by characterizing the erythema induction versus DNA‐damaging effectiveness of tubes.
Bibliography:Posted on the website on 25 July 2002.
istex:2061847E07EE6B82832B76E96D628CC852E16000
ark:/67375/WNG-ZD5RNW98-9
ArticleID:PHP391
ISSN:0031-8655
1751-1097
DOI:10.1562/0031-8655(2002)0760391BUDIQC2.0.CO2