Combining Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radioactive-Free Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-palpable Breast Tumors: A Feasibility Study

Background: Magnetic seed localization is a novel and reliable technique for perioperative localization of non-palpable breast cancers. However, due to susceptibility artifacts, magnetic seeds cannot be in situ during response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI. Contrast-enhanced mammog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cancer Vol. 15; no. 19; pp. 6177 - 6184
Main Authors: Theunissen, Jarn E.M., van Haaren, Els R.M., Frotscher, Caroline N.A., Körver-Steeman, Rachelle R.M., Janssen, Alfred, Vissers, Yvonne L.J., van Bastelaar, James, Valentijn-Morsing, Anja, Bouwman, Lee, Lobbes, Marc B.I.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Sydney Ivyspring International Publisher 01-01-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Magnetic seed localization is a novel and reliable technique for perioperative localization of non-palpable breast cancers. However, due to susceptibility artifacts, magnetic seeds cannot be in situ during response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could provide an alternative modality for response monitoring while magnetic seeds are in situ. This feasibility study aimed to investigate whether implanted magnetic seeds cause imaging artifacts in CEM examinations. Methods: A phantom experiment and patient studies were conducted to assess the presence of imaging artifacts caused by magnetic seeds on CEM. Chicken breast filet phantoms containing magnetic seeds were imaged using CEM and MRI. Next, twenty women with non-palpable breast tumors scheduled for breast-conserving surgery were included and received a magnetic marker seed preoperatively. Immediately after seed implantation, postprocedural images were taken using the CEM mode on our mammography units. All images were assessed by two experienced breast radiologists for the presence of artifacts. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study results. Results: The phantom experiment revealed no imaging artifacts on CEM, whereas significant artifacts were present on MRI. This allowed us to continue with the patient studies, in which no imaging artifacts associated with magnetic seeds were observed at all. Surgical outcomes demonstrated successful retrieval of all magnetic seeds and negative surgical margins in 19 out of 20 cases. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the combination of CEM and magnetic seeds is feasible and does not cause any significant imaging artifacts.Background: Magnetic seed localization is a novel and reliable technique for perioperative localization of non-palpable breast cancers. However, due to susceptibility artifacts, magnetic seeds cannot be in situ during response monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MRI. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) could provide an alternative modality for response monitoring while magnetic seeds are in situ. This feasibility study aimed to investigate whether implanted magnetic seeds cause imaging artifacts in CEM examinations. Methods: A phantom experiment and patient studies were conducted to assess the presence of imaging artifacts caused by magnetic seeds on CEM. Chicken breast filet phantoms containing magnetic seeds were imaged using CEM and MRI. Next, twenty women with non-palpable breast tumors scheduled for breast-conserving surgery were included and received a magnetic marker seed preoperatively. Immediately after seed implantation, postprocedural images were taken using the CEM mode on our mammography units. All images were assessed by two experienced breast radiologists for the presence of artifacts. Descriptive statistics were used to present the study results. Results: The phantom experiment revealed no imaging artifacts on CEM, whereas significant artifacts were present on MRI. This allowed us to continue with the patient studies, in which no imaging artifacts associated with magnetic seeds were observed at all. Surgical outcomes demonstrated successful retrieval of all magnetic seeds and negative surgical margins in 19 out of 20 cases. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the combination of CEM and magnetic seeds is feasible and does not cause any significant imaging artifacts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The Pintuition Seed® magnetic marker seeds utilized in this study were provided free-of-charge by Sirius Medical B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands. The authors have declared that no other possibly competing interest exists.
ISSN:1837-9664
1837-9664
DOI:10.7150/jca.98597