The influence of treatment modality on long-term neurocognitive functioning in treatment resistant bipolar depressed inpatients treated with pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy

Introduction Bipolar depression is difficult to manage, and causes considerable disability and distress for patients and their surroundings. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment, but there are concerns regarding long-term neurocognitive impairment, and in particular autobiograph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European psychiatry Vol. 33; no. S1; p. S329
Main Authors: Bjorke-Bertheussen, J, Auestad, B, Kessler, U, Schoyen, H
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Masson SAS 01-03-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Bipolar depression is difficult to manage, and causes considerable disability and distress for patients and their surroundings. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment, but there are concerns regarding long-term neurocognitive impairment, and in particular autobiographical memory. Objectives To compare the long-term effects of algorithm-based pharmacologic treatment (APT) and ECT in treatment-resistant bipolar depression as measured with standard neurocognitive tests and autobiographical memory interview. Aims To examine the long-term neurocognitive effects of ECT. Methods In this multicenter randomized controlled trial 73 in-patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression were randomized to either APT or unilateral ECT. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 6 months. Neurocognitive functions were assessed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) and the Autobiographical Memory Inventory - Short form (AMI-SF). At 6 months, neurocognitive data were available for 26 patients (APT n = 11, ECT n = 15). Results There were no group-differences at baseline. At 6 months, there was no group-difference in MCCB-score (APT 44.9 vs. ECT 46.0, P -value: 0.707), or WASI total IQ-score (APT 103.9 vs. ECT 107.2, P -value: 0.535). There were indications of ( P -value: 0.109) poorer AMI-SF consistency score in the ECT group (APT 72.3% vs. ECT 64.3%). Conclusions This study does not find that ECT causes long-term impairment in neurocognitive function as measured with standard neuropsychological tests. We find a trend towards poorer autobiographical memory in the ECT-group, and there needs to be further research regarding this.
ISSN:0924-9338
1778-3585
DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1142